Quantcast
Channel: Does the Definition of a Formal Proof in Mendelson's Book Allow for the Use of Theorem/Derived Axiom Schema in Formal Proofs? - Mathematics Stack Exchange
Browsing latest articles
Browse All 3 View Live

Answer by Doug Spoonwood for Does the Definition of a Formal Proof in...

It forbids substitutions in theorems in formal proofs (NO formal proofs exist in the book... not a single one). But, that is not generally how the axiomatic method has gotten used historically speaking.

View Article


Answer by user21820 for Does the Definition of a Formal Proof in Mendelson's...

By the very definition you gave, clearly a proof can only use the given rules of inference and hence cannot invoke theorems in the meta-system. A common meta-theorem is the deduction theorem, namely...

View Article

Does the Definition of a Formal Proof in Mendelson's Book Allow for the Use...

The relevance of this question concerns deciding whether or not a sequence of well-formed formulas in a text will qualify as a formal proof.Mendelson's Introduction to Mathematical Logic on p. 25 of...

View Article
Browsing latest articles
Browse All 3 View Live




<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>